Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 FSUPP3D 8 - Lipman v. Antoon

Lipman v. Antoon’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
October 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Wultz v. Bank of China, Ltd. · Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Valle Del Sol, Inc. · Global Tel*Link v. Federal Communications Commission · Duck v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission · Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Deloitte & Touche LLP

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the general interest in protecting local nonparties by requiring local resolution of subpoena-related disputes is significantly reduced because [Mr. Gillespie and Mr. Morgan are] represented by a firm familiar with this litigation and the issuing court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he centrality of the relevance assessment weighs in favor of transfer because determining whether information is relevant requires nuanced legal analysis based on a full understanding of the [u]nderlying [a]ction”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “there is a strong possibility that [Respondents'] counsel will not even need to leave Washington, D.C. to litigate the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.