Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 Ga. App. 92 - Striplin v. State

284 Ga. App. 92 - Striplin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Eubanks · Stinson v. State · 279 Ga. App. 347 - Nye v. State · 251 Ga. App. 856 - Roseberry v. State · 278 Ga. App. 142 - Dowdell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Mere surplusage will not vitiate an indictment, and need not be established in proof. The material facts which constitute the offense charged must be stated and they must be proved in evidence. But allegations not essential to such purpose, which might be entirely omitted without affecting the charge and without detriment to the indictment, are considered as mere surplusage, and may be disregarded in evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.