Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Doherty’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 73 Ill. 2d 204 - People v. Lutz · 78 Ill. 2d 8 - Dienes v. Holland · 6 Mich. App. 656 - Great Lakes Steel Corp. v. Employment Security Commission · 64 Ill. App. 3d 109 - Dienes v. Holland · 275 Ill. App. 3d 945 - County of Coles v. Property Tax Appeal Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Labor Dispute. An individual shall be ineligible for benefits for any week with respect to which it is found that his total or partial unemployment is due to a stoppage of work which exists because of a labor dispute at the factory, establishment, or other premises at which he is or was last employed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Until a claimant becomes employed to the extent that his new employer becomes chargeable for benefits (basically 30 days), the claimant remains `last employed' with (and barred from receiving benefits from) the employer with whom he was originally embroiled in a labor dispute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]ection 1502.1 of the Act provides an objective, bright-line method of determining whether an individual has requalified for unemployment benefits and avoids the subjectivity inherent in any type of `good-faith' inquiry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.