State v. Hoeck’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably State v. Thompson (2007), Miller v. Johnson (2012)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Franks v. Delaware · Aguilar v. Texas · Horton v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(1) the magistrate issuing the warrant was deliberately misled by false information; (2) the magistrate wholly abandoned his or her detached or neutral role; (3) there was so little indicia of probable cause contained in the affidavit that it was entirely unreasonable for the officers to believe the warrant was valid; or (4) the warrant so lacked specificity that officers could not determine the place to be searched or the items to be seized." State v. Hoeck , 284 Kan. 441 , 464, 163 P.3d 252 (2007).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct rather than to punish the errors of judges and magistrates.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.