State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
73 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably State v. King (2009), State v. Warledo (2008)
73 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Crawford v. Washington · Koon v. United States · Davis v. Washington · Holmes v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“" Varies, depending on the character of the question presented for determination. A district court’s decision is protected if reasonable persons could differ about the propriety of the decision, as long as it was made within and took into account tire applicable legal standards. If, among other things, a district court’s decision goes outside the legal framework or fails to properly consider statutory hmitations, it constitutes an abuse of discretion.’ [Citation omitted.]” State v. Miller, 284 Kan. 682, 689 , 163 P.3d 267 (2007).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Murray“`A trial court's determination of whether a statement is admissible under the Kansas hearsay statutes is reviewed by this court for an abuse of discretion, which includes a determination that the trial court's discretion was exercised in light of a correct understanding of the applicable law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hughes“`under circumstances which would lead an objective witness reasonably to believe that the statement would be available for use at a later trial.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hughes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.