Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 Kan. 728 - State v. Davis

State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2021

17 state decisions

130200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullins Coal Co. v. Director · Ford v. Wainwright · United States v. Security Industrial Bank · State v. Holmes · State v. Engelhardt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant has a constitutional right to be present during critical stages of a criminal proceeding. That right emanates from the Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses and from the right to due process guaranteed under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [Citations omitted.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The test you must use in determining whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty is this: “If you have a reasonable doubt as to the truth of any of the claims required to be proved by the State, you must find the defendant not guilty; or “If you have no reasonable doubt as to the truth of any of the claims required to be proved by the State, you should find the defendant guilty.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he presence of a defendant is a condition of due process to the extent that a fair and just hearing would be thwarted by his absence, and to that extent only.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.