Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 N.C. 568 - Crutcher v. Noel

Crutcher v. Noel’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2019

21 state decisions

7019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. . Little · 14 Ill. 2d 203 - The People v. Izzo · State v. . Knotts · Cuthrell v. . Greene · Perry v. Western North Carolina Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The general rule is that counsel may argue all the evidence to the jury, with such inferences as may be drawn therefrom; but he may not ‘travel outside of the record’ and inject into his argument facts of his own knowledge or other facts not included in the evidence. Cuthrell v. Greene, 229 N.C. 475 , 50 S.E. 2d 525 ; State v. Little, 228 N.C. 417 , 45 S.E. 2d 542 ; and Perry v. Western North Carolina R. Co., 128 N.C. 471 , 39 S.E. 27 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.