284 N.J. Super. 142 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1998
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Tucker · Burgett v. Texas · Custis v. United States · Desist v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any ground for relief not raised in a prior proceeding under this rule, or in the proceedings resulting in the conviction, or in a post-conviction proceeding brought and decided prior to the adoption of this rule, or in any appeal taken in any such proceedings is barred from assertion in a proceeding under this rule unless the court on motion or at the hearing finds ... (b) that enforcement of the bar would result in fundamental injustice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams“A conviction in another jurisdiction shall constitute a prior conviction of a crime if a sentence of imprisonment in excess of 6 months was authorized under the law of the other jurisdiction. [N.J.S.A 2C:44-4c (emphasis added).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.