Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 Or. 539 - Mathies v. Hoeck

Mathies v. Hoeck’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

8 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2018

8 district · 3 state decisions

6019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the evidence disclosed as a matter of law that the plaintiff, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have discovered in August, 1972, that the carpenters and laborers had not been paid $12 per hour as represented.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the period of limitations for fraud begins to run when the plaintiff knows or should have known of the alleged fraud.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “had sufficient notice to excite his attention”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.