Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 ORAPP 1 - Jackson v. Franke

Jackson v. Franke’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Absent any indication that the Supreme Court was seeking a case with attributes like petitioner's to use as a vehicle for addressing the Southard issue, nothing but speculation supports petitioner's contention that the court might have granted review in his case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"In the absence of an affidavit from an Oregon Supreme Court Justice confirming that petitioner's case would have been the vehicle for the principle of law announced in Southard , petitioner's claims in this regard are unsubstantiated speculation."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any attributes of petitioner's case that might have made it a particularly good candidate for Supreme Court review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.