Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 ORAPP 194 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he record does not contain evidence that would allow a nonspeculative inference that something of significance occurred between the defendant's sequential acts of touching.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.