284 Or. App. 276 - State v. Bement’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] jury could infer that the excluded email statements depict increasing desperation about his perceived financial straits, and that inference would come in part from seeing the historical progression of [Greenspan]'s distress over time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bement“statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bement“[a] statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind, emotion, sensation or physical condition”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bement
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.