Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 ORAPP 38 - State v. J. T. C.

State v. J. T. C.’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence that is of extraordinary persuasiveness, and which makes the fact in issue highly probable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “condition at the time of the hearing as understood in the context of [her] history.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “carried out an overt violent act in the past against another person”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.