Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 S.C. 481 - Caddel v. Gates

Caddel v. Gates’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
September 2004
most recently cited

2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2004

2 district · 5 state decisions

40198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 48 Cal. App. 3d 917 - Jarchow v. Transamerica Title Insurance · McLaughlin v. Sullivan · Deno v. Transamerica Title Insurance · Perkio v. Prunier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “though regrettable the overlooking of an encumbrance by an attorney examining title”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.