Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 So. 2d 198 - State v. Johnson

284 So. 2d 198 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
December 2001
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2001

20 state decisions

1001973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 266 So. 2d 661 - State v. Matera · 247 So. 2d 53 - Pitts v. State · 249 So. 2d 47 - State v. Pitts · 207 So. 2d 493 - Scott v. State · 268 So. 2d 170 - Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We must also bear in mind that police reports and documents often include leads to other cases and other suspects. This information must be protected in order to afford fair pursuit of such involvement by others and the solution of other offenses. These important objectives can be destroyed or defeated if police reports are made so readily available; the police would understandably be hesitant to enter freely in reports what might be of help later on if they were not generally protected.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]bsent some singular importance attaching to the point in question, which goes to a material and critical fact in serious contention in the trial, a negative basis is not the kind of use of a police report which justifies breaching the normally protected police reports and investigative notes, reports and files.... The inquiry must be upon a crucial point... and the point involved in vital focus so that it becomes critical to the defense.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.