Miller v. Esca Rosa Development Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schwob Co. v. Florida Industrial Commission · 140 So. 2d 73 - Hertz Corporation v. Hellens · Escambia Chem. Corp. v. Industrial-Marine Sup. Co. · Mathis v. Virgin · 254 So. 2d 812 - Arenson v. Ford Motor Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 4.6. Certified Questions From State Courts "a. When Certified. When it shall appear to a judge of the lower court that there is involved in any cause pending before him questions or propositions of law that are determinative of the cause and are without controlling precedent in this state and that instruction from the Court will facilitate the proper disposition of the cause, said judge, on his own motion or on motion of either party, may certify said question or proposition of law to the Court for instruction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.