Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 So. 2d 305 - Stampley v. State

284 So. 2d 305 - Stampley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2017

13 state decisions

6019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Passons v. State · White v. State · 6 Wash. 2d 324 - Sweazey v. Valley Transport, Inc. · Smith v. State · Sanders v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “admission of a prior consistent statement of a witness where the veracity of the witness has been attacked is proper but `should be received by the court with great caution and only for the purpose of rebuttal so as to enable the jury to make a correct appraisal of the credibility of the witness.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[e]vidence of prior consistent statements made by the witness is not evidence of the fact testified to by the witness, but may be offered for the sole purpose of supporting the testimony of the witness whose veracity has been attacked.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “prior consistent statements of a witness are admissible when his credibility has been attacked by proof of prior inconsistent statements for the purpose of rebuttal [cites omitted] provided the witness denies having made the alleged inconsistent statement, or admits them, but explains them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.