State v. Richmond’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

cited by 77 later decisions

states following

October 2009

most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 75 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently October 2009 · most notably 360 So. 2d 500 - State v. Drew (1978), 315 So. 2d 675 - State v. Carlisle (1975)

1 federal appellate · 75 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Benton v. Maryland · Rideau v. Louisiana · Detenber v. American Universal Insurance Co · Harris v. Washington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“"A change of venue shall be granted when the applicant proves that by reason of prejudice existing in the public mind or because of undue influence, or that for any other reason, a fair and impartial trial cannot be obtained in the parish where the prosecution is pending. "In deciding whether to grant a change of venue the court shall consider whether the prejudice, the influence, or the other reasons are such that they will affect the answers of jurors on the voir dire examination or the testimony of witnesses at the trial."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. LaGarde · State v. Stewart
“* * * where the defense did not make a showing of a compelling reason for granting a recess, at the time the motion was made, it cannot be said the trial court abused its discretion by refusing the recess.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 321 So. 2d 331 - State v. Sharp · 322 So. 2d 211 - State v. Brown
“* * * Where the gravamen of the second offense is essentially included within the offense for which first tried, the second prosecution is barred because of the former jeopardy. * * *”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Pettle · 345 So. 2d 446 - State Ex Rel. Smith v. Phelps

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.