Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 So. 2d 536 - State v. Tharp

284 So. 2d 536 - State v. Tharp’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably State v. Kimble (1981), 319 So. 2d 367 - State v. Babin (1975)

32 state decisions

17019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500

Relies on 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · People v. Gallardo · State v. Hudson · 278 So. 2d 485 - State v. Douglas · State v. Gladden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A witness may be allowed to refresh his memory by reference to his testimony given on the preliminary examination, or at a coroner's investigation, or on a previous trial, or, for the purpose of refreshing his present memory a witness may examine memoranda, and it is immaterial by whom or when the memoranda were made, provided that, after such inspection, the witness can testify to the fact.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"We reject the State's argument that this witness was testifying from memory refreshed outside the courtroom prior to taking the stand. The witness stated that his testimony came from his report which he had with him on the stand. * * *" (Emphasis ours)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In such instances the witness has no independent testimony of the recorded information, but actually vouches for the accuracy and veracity of the record. The witness swears to the truth and accuracy of his habits in recording information.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.