284 So. 2d 673 - Aaron v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 69 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably 471 So. 2d 1274 - Bowen v. Bowen (1985), 347 So. 2d 422 - Pugliese v. Pugliese (1977)
1 federal appellate · 69 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Argersinger v. Hamlin · Bloom v. Illinois · Baldwin v. New York · Cheff v. Schnackenberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The right of persons accused of serious offenses to know, before trial, the specific nature and detail of crimes they are charged with committing is a basic right guaranteed by our Federal and State Constitutions.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“effectively criminal in nature and persons accused of [criminal] contempt are as much entitled to the basic constitutional rights as are those accused of violating criminal statutes.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“criminal contempt is a crime under Florida law,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.