Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

284 S.W. 330

Reynolds v. Gilbert

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 20, 1925

Court of Appeals of Texas · decided 1925-11-20

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1939

5 state decisions

Relies on Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Scott · 53 Tex. Civ. App. 474 - Williams v. D. H. Bell & Co. · Kolp v. Weil Bros.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1925-11-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*331 LITTLER, J.

¶1 This is a suit instituted by Scott W. Gilbert, appellee, against J. H. Reynolds, W. H. Reynolds, and O. M. Reynolds, appellants, to recover upon a promissory note in the sum of $3,280.50, alleged to be executed by the three defendants, J. H. Reynolds, W. H. Reynolds, and C. M. Reynolds.

¶2 The record shows that a Judgment.was rendered against J. H. Reynolds and O. M. Reynolds, but fails to show that disposition of the case was made as to the defendant W. H. Reynolds, and therefore fails to show that there was a final judgment in the case. Kolp v. Weil Bros. (Tex. Civ. App.) 173 S. W. 1006; Willis v. Keator (Tex. Civ. App.) 181 S. W. 556; G., C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Atlantic Fruit Dist. (Tex. Civ. App.) 184 S. W. 294; Williams v. Bell, 53 Tex. Civ. App. 474, 116 S. W. 837; Railway Co. v. Scott, 78 Tex. 360, 14 S. W. 791; Railway Co. v. Smith Co., 58 Tex. 76.

¶3 There being no final judgment shown by the record, this court is without jurisdiction, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.

/284/sw/330 · .json · Public domain