Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 S.W.3d 690 - State v. McGee

State v. McGee’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Davis v. Washington · Burgett v. Texas · Nichols v. United States · Baldasar v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person is responsible for his own conduct and he is also responsible for the conduct of (another person) (other persons) in committing an offense if he acts with the other person(s) with the common purpose of committing that offense or if, for the purpose of committing that offense, he aids or encourages the other person(s) in committing it. (As to Count _, if) (IQ you find and believe from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt: First, that (on) (on or about) [date], in the (City) (Comity) of_, State of Missouri, [Continue using the paragraphs from the MAI-CR 3d verdict director applicable to the offense and set out all the elements of the offense, ascribing the elements to the defendant or other person or persons with whom the defendant acted. See Notes on Use 5 for suggestions on handling various types of situations. See Notes on Use 7(b) for handling murder in the first degree. Place a comma at the end of the last paragraph submitting the elements of the offense. Then add the following: ] then you are instructed that the offense of [name of offense ] has occurred, and if you further find and believe from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt: (Second) (Third) ([next numbered paragraph ]), that with the purpose of promoting or furthering the commission of that [name of offense ], the defendant [Insert basis for defendant’s conduct being sufficient for being criminally responsible, using one of the following “(acted together with) (aided or encouraged) (acted together wi”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “testimony is so inherently incredible, self-destructive or opposed to known physical facts on a vital point or element”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The trial court's determination that a witness is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.