¶1 ORDER
¶2 Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of the sale of a controlled substance, in violation of section 195.211 RSMo (2000). The trial court found him to be a prior and persistent drug offender and sentenced him to ten years imprisonment.
¶3 No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
¶4 The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).