Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 U.S. 498 - Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co.

Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co.’s Empirical Analysis

284 U.S. 498 · 1932

Citation profile

1,139
cited by 1,139 later decisions
21
cited 21 times by the Supreme Court
15
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

481 federal appellate · 102 district · 79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,139 later decisions (21 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2018 · most notably Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co. (1962), Bob Jones University v. Simon (1974)

481 federal appellate · 102 district · 79 state decisions — followed in 15 states

2620193219401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedMiller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Florida (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad · Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad · State Railroad Tax Cases Taylor Collector et al. v. Secor et al. · Hill v. Wallace

Cited together with Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co. · Hill v. Wallace · Dodge v. Osborn · Allen v. Regents of University System of Georgia · Snyder v. Marks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,139 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “extraordinary and exceptional circumstances”
    30 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “* * * no suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court.”
    22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The court, having held the product to be not taxable as oleomargarine, the fact that retailers advertise and sell it as butter, or as a substitute for butter, would not render them or the manufacturers liable under the internal revenue law.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.