Turner v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Landrum v. CHIPPENHAM AND JOHNSTON-WILLIS · Angel v. Com. · 22 Va. App. 46 - Jones v. Commonwealth · Longshore v. Commonwealth · Sapp v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when a relevant factor that should have been given significant weight is not considered; when an irrelevant or improper factor is considered and given significant weight; and when all proper factors, and no improper ones, are considered, but the court, in weighing those factors, commits a clear error of judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.