M. A. P. v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
40 federal appellate · 21 district · 582 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 660 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Commonwealth v. Hubbard (1977), Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt (1983)
40 federal appellate · 21 district · 582 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3060
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gault · Kent v. United States · Coleman v. Alabama · McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 660 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[N]o division of this court will overrule a prior decision of this court or refuse to follow a decision of the United States Court of Appeals rendered prior to February 1, 1971[.]”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage“[N]o division of this court will overrule a prior decision of this court . . . and . . . such [a] result can only be accomplished by this court en banc.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) Except as provided by subsection (b) of this section, every final judgment or final decree for the payment of money rendered in the— (1) United States District Court for the District of Columbia; or (2) Superior Court of the District of Columbia, when filed and recorded in the office of the Recorder of Deeds of the District of Columbia, is enforceable, by execution issued thereon, for the period of twelve years only from the date when an execution might first be issued thereon, or from the date of the last order of revival thereof.... (b) At the expiration of the twelve-year period provided by subsection (a) of this section, the judgment or decree shall cease to have any operation or effect. Thereafter, except in the case of a proceeding that may be then pending for the enforcement of the judgment or decree, action may not be brought on it, nor may it be revived, and execution may not issue on it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Padgett v. Padgett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.