Bolton v. Marr

¶1In an action to recover for legal services rendered and expenditures made in connection therewith, plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion to dismiss the counterclaim of defendant James Marr for the transfer and delivery to him of certain shares of stock in the defendant corporation, on the grounds of the Statute of Limitations and laches. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, MacCrate, Beldock and Ughetta, JJ., concur; Nolan, P.J., not voting.