¶1Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We regard the order appealed from as a discretionary order and we see no reason to disturb the discretion of the Special Term. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Erie Special Term directing plaintiff to serve a further bill of particulars, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — McGurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.
285 A.D. 863
Mioducki v. Becht
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 14, 1955
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1955-01-14
Decided 1955-01-14