Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 ALA 170 - Carr v. Samuels

Carr v. Samuels’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 1988
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gray v. State Ex Rel. Attorney General · Ralston Purina Co. v. Pierce · Ex Parte Talley · Davis v. McCampbell · Griswold v. Thornton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The security for costs in this case being signed by only those who were parties to the suit in the court below, is not in compliance with the requirements of Section 439 (now Section 792, supra), which has been decided by this court to be peremptory. (Par. ours.) “ * * * “ ‘As no security for costs was given in compliance with the statute, it follows that the motion to dismiss must prevail.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.