Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 Ala. 488 - Divine v. State

Divine v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 1990
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 1990

20 state decisions

120197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roberts v. Florida · Johnson v. Williams · Lamb v. State of Florida · Oliver v. State · Ex Parte Seals

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it would indefinitely protract litigation, destroy the stability and certainty of judicial proceedings, and open wide the door to perjury and fraud.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]n error of fact which may be used as a basis for a writ of error coram nobis does not consist of new evidence going to the merits of the case”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.