Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 ARK 279 - Janes v. State

Janes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 1988
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Baldasar v. Illinois · Lovell v. State · State v. Brown · McConahay v. State · Williford v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have consistently held that where there is a particular defect in the State’s proof that might readily have been corrected had an objection been made, the absence of any objection prevents the point’s being raised for the first time on appeal. For instance, where the State’s proof by accomplices is not corroborated, the absence of an objection on that ground at trial waives the omission. [Citation omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We have consistently held that where there is a particular defect in the State’s proof that might readily have been corrected had an objection been made, the absence of any objection prevents the point’s being raised for the first time on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.