Janes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 1988
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Baldasar v. Illinois · Lovell v. State · State v. Brown · McConahay v. State · Williford v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have consistently held that where there is a particular defect in the State’s proof that might readily have been corrected had an objection been made, the absence of any objection prevents the point’s being raised for the first time on appeal. For instance, where the State’s proof by accomplices is not corroborated, the absence of an objection on that ground at trial waives the omission. [Citation omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Russell v. State“We have consistently held that where there is a particular defect in the State’s proof that might readily have been corrected had an objection been made, the absence of any objection prevents the point’s being raised for the first time on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ballew v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.