In Re Lemons’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 18 U.S.C. § 152
Relies on Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · Bruning v. United States · Andersen v. UNIPAC-NEBHELP · In Re Christopher Banks · Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ll bankruptcy counsel are hereby placed on notice of this Court’s dim view of ... gamesmanship .... This Court “may impose sanctions on its own initiative,” Rule 9011(c)(1)(B), and will not hesitate to take appropriate action to deter such conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“This court agrees with the numerous courts that characterize Andersen as a res judicata case, and further agrees with the Banks court that the Andersen court failed to address the due process requirement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.