Massachusetts v. Bogan’s Empirical Analysis
285 F. 668 · 1923
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
May 1932
most recently cited
3 district ·
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In view of recent decisions of the Supreme Court (see Lipke v. Lederer [ 259 U. S. 557 ] 42 S. Ct. 549 , 66 L. Ed. 1061 ), it seems clear that the National Prohibition Act is not a revenue law, and it follows that prohibition agents are not ‘appointed or acting by authority of any revenue law of the United States.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.