Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 F.1d 931 - Eisinger v. E. J. Murphy Co.

Eisinger v. E. J. Murphy Co.’s Empirical Analysis

285 F. 931 · 1922

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 1925
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 48 App. D.C. 476 - Eisinger v. E. J. Murphy Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the instrument contains, or a person adds to his signature, words indicating that he signs for or on behalf of a principal, or in a representative capacity, he is not liable on the instrument if he was duly authorized, but the mere addition of words describing him as an agent, or as filling a representative character, without disclosing his principal, does not exempt him from personal liability,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.