Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

285 F.2d 113

Docket No. 17088.

Boblitt v. United States

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1960-12-16

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1960

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Angelus Milling Co. v. Commissioner · Arens v. Village of Rogers · Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. Deal

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1960-12-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Hersh & Hadfield, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Laurence E. Dayton, U. S. Atty., William P. Clancey, John Kaplan, Asst. U. S. Attys., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The judgment of conviction for a violation of 33 U.S.C.A. § 407 is reversed. The "deposit of loose timber and other materials upon the bank of a navigable water, to-wit, San Francisco Bay," was charged.

¶2

We are unable to convince ourselves that there is enough evidence in the record from which the jury was entitled to find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was guilty.

/285/f2d/113 · .json · Public domain