Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 F.2d 309 - Tepper v. Chichester

Tepper v. Chichester’s Empirical Analysis

285 F.2d 309 · 1960

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
July 1993
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently July 1993 · most notably Klein v. Tabatchnick (1979), Securities & Exchange Commission v. F. O. Baroff Co. (1974)

21 federal appellate · 3 district ·

2001960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford · Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank · Ex parte Davis · Corn Exchange Nat Bank Trust Co Philadelphia v. Klauder · Holt v. Crucible Steel Company of America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reclamation proceedings, the findings of the referee on questions of intent . are questions of fact, or in some instances, mixed questions of law and of fact, and the findings of the referee . will not be set aside on anything less than a demonstration of clear mistake in applying the law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.