Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

285 F.2d 527

Docket No. 18571.

Continental Oil Company and Charles B. Wrightsman v. Federal Power Commission and United Gas Pipe Line Company

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1961-01-20

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1983

4 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co. · Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Laborde · United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. McCullough

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1961-01-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Robert C. Hawley, Tom Burton, Houston, Tex., Mort Walker, Jr., New Orleans, La., for petitioners.

Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Solicitor, John C. Mason, Gen. Counsel, Arthur H. Fribourg, Atty., Federal Power Comm., Washington, D.C., for respondents.

Before RIVES, JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This petition seeks the review of a telegraphic order of the Federal Power Commission addressed to Continental Oil Company reading: 'Your petition for declaratory order and order to show cause be and is hereby denied by direction of the Commission.' That order merely denied the petitioners discretionary declaratory relief and the petitioners are not aggrieved thereby. This Court has no jurisdiction to review the commission's refusal to issue such a declaratory order. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 1953, 203 F.2d 78. See also, Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 1938, 304 U.S. 375, 384, 58 S.Ct. 963, 82 L.Ed. 1408. The petition for review is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

¶2

Dismissed.

/285/f2d/527 · .json · Public domain