Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 F.3d 74 - Hall v. Clinton

Hall v. Clinton’s Empirical Analysis

285 F.3d 74 · 2002

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
July 2022
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 26 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Barr v. Clinton (2004), Grimes ex rel. Estate of Grimes v. District of Columbia (2015)

11 federal appellate · 26 district ·

290200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Papasan v. Allain · Heckler v. Chaney · Wheat v. United States · Williams v. United States · Bush v. Lucas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he standards for establishing the preclusive effect of an earlier holding are: First, the same issue now being raised must have been contested by the parties and submitted for judicial determination in the prior case. Second, the issue must have been actually and necessarily determined by a court of competent jurisdiction in that prior case.... Third, preclusion in the second case must not work a basic unfairness to the party bound by the first determination. An example of such unfairness would be when the losing party clearly lacked any incentive to litigate the point in the first trial, but the stakes of the second trial are of a vastly greater magnitude.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Civil conspiracy, of course, is not actionable in and of itself but serves instead 'as a device through which vicarious liability for the underlying wrong may be imposed upon all who are a party to it, where the requisite agreement exists among them.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Among other things, section 1985 plaintiffs must allege the elements of civil conspiracy, including: 'an agreement to take part in an unlawful action or a lawful action in an unlawful manner.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.