285 F. Supp. 123 - Alcoa Steamship Company v. Velez’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2018
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2202
Relies on Costello v. United States · United States v. Union Central Life Insurance · Sancho v. Yabucoa Sugar Co · Clarksburg Publishing Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · Adrico Realty Corp. v. City of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a policy cannot be issued to cover only a part of the employer's activities, and, hence, if they refused to pay, they would have been non-insured employers, not only in respect to the newly created classification, but also in respect to all their operations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.