Holsten Import Corp. v. Rheingold Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2005
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on Moore v. New York Cotton Exchange · United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. Peyser · Gold Seal Company v. Weeks · S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Gold Seal Co. · Smith-Victor Corporation v. Sylvania Electric Products, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.