Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 FSUPP2D 58 - Basel Action Network v. Maritime Administration

Basel Action Network v. Maritime Administration’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
August 2006
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2605 (§ 6 of the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976) · 15 U.S.C. § 2619 (§ 20 of the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976) · 16 U.S.C. § 5401 (National Maritime Heritage Act of 1994) · 16 U.S.C. § 5405 · 42 U.S.C. § 4321 (§ 2 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969) · 42 U.S.C. § 4332 (§ 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969)

Relies on Bennett v. Spear · Hallstrom v. Tillamook County · Amoco Oil Company v. Environmental Protection Agency, Ashland Oil, Inc. And Skelly Oil Company v. Environmental Protection Agency, Clark Oil and Refining Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency · Sierra Club v. Peterson · United States v. Bank of Farmington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any claim made directly under TSCA would be premature.” Id. 13 . A similar allegation against the Environmental Protection Agency (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.