Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 Ga. 1 - Bradford v. State

Bradford v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2025

9 state decisions

60200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baker v. State · Perkinson v. State · State v. Boyer · Baker v. State · Powe v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when he together with one or more persons conspires to commit any crime and any one or more of such persons does any overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]hen the phrase challenged as vague has a commonly understood meaning, then it is sufficiently definite to satisfy due process requirements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.