Murrell v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Fortson v. State · Davis v. State · Head v. Thomason · Carter v. Johnson · Nelson v. Zant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A (habeas) petition . . . shall . . . clearly set forth the respects in which the petitioner's rights were violated." OCGA § 9-14-44. "All grounds for relief claimed by a (habeas) petitioner . . . shall be raised . . . in his original or amended petition." OCGA § 9-14-51.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. Hall“the issue was not properly raised as required under OCGA §§ 9-14-44 and 9-14-51,. . . the habeas court accordingly erred by granting relief on this issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. Hall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.