Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 ILLAPP 523 - Thompson v. Otis

Thompson v. Otis’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2010

14 state decisions

70193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weisguth v. Supreme Tribe of Ben Hur · Zukowski v. Armour

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““New parties may be added and parties misjoined may be dropped by order of the court, at any stage of the cause, before or after judgment, as the ends of justice may require and on terms which the court may fix.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.