Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 Ill. App. 3d 721 - Woods v. Cole

285 Ill. App. 3d 721 - Woods v. Cole’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1998
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 70 Ill. 2d 1 - Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package MacHinery Co. · 148 Ill. 2d 429 - Burke v. 12 Rothschild's Liquor Mart, Inc. · 161 Ill. 2d 267 - Ziarko v. Soo Line Railroad · 216 Ill. App. 3d 962 - Sanke v. Bechina · 140 Ill. App. 3d 191 - Bristow v. Griffitts Construction Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““For harm resulting to a third person from the tortious conduct of another, one is subject to liability if he (a) does a tortious act in concert with the other or pursuant to a common design with him, or (b) knows that the other’s conduct constitutes a breach of duty and gives substantial assistance or encouragement to the other so to conduct himself, or (c) gives substantial assistance to the other in accomplishing a tortious result and his own conduct, separately considered, constitutes a breach of duty to the third person.” Restatement (Second) of Torts § 876, at 315 (1979).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Whether the provisions of 735 ILCS 5/2 — 1117 are applicable to a person found liable in negligence for the bodily injury or death of another where the liability of the person found liable is based on that person having been found to be ‘acting in concert’ under Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 876.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.