Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 Kan. 176 - State v. Sappington

State v. Sappington’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
2
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably State v. Warledo (2008), State v. Bridges (2013)

49 state decisions

290200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · State v. Gunby · State v. Tosh · State v. Holmes · State v. Elnicki

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Even where the defendant concedes the cause of death, the prosecution has the burden to prove all the elements of the crime charged; and photographs to prove the elements of the crime, including the fact and manner of death and the violent nature of the crime, are relevant and admissible. [Citations omitted.] Photographs depicting the extent, nature, and number of wounds inflicted are generally relevant in a first-degree murder case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The test you must use in determining whether the defendant is guilty or not is this: If you have a reasonable doubt as to the truth of any of the claims required to be proved by the State, you must find the defendant not guilty. If you have no reasonable doubt as to the truth of each of the claims required to be proved by the State, you should find the defendant guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.