State v. Bryant’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
76 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably State v. McCaslin (2011), State v. Warledo (2008)
76 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · State v. Gunby · State v. Pabst · State v. Tosh · State v. Holmes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In the second step of the two-step prosecutorial misconduct analysis, the appellate court considers three factors to determine whether a new trial should be granted: (1) whether the misconduct is gross and flagrant; (2) whether the misconduct shows ill will on the prosecutor’s part; and (3) whether the evidence against the defendant is of such a direct and overwhelming nature that the misconduct would likely have little weight in the minds of the jurors. None of these three factors is individually controlling. Before the third factor can ever override the first two factors, an appellate court must be able to say that the harmlessness tests of both K.S.A. 60-261 (inconsistent with substantial justice) and Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 17 L. Ed. 2d 705 , 87 S. Ct. 824 (1967) (conclusion beyond reasonable doubt that the error had little, if any, likelihood of having changed the results of the trial), have been met.” State v. Bryant, 285 Kan. 970 , Syl. ¶ 2, 179 P.3d 1122 (2008).”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'a reasonable basis for believing the attorneyclient relation has not deteriorated to a point where appointed counsel can no longer give effective aid in the fair presentation of a defense.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“As a general rule, a party must make a timely and specific objection to the admission of evidence in order to preserve the issue for appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.