Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 285 Ky. 808 - Glanton v. Renner

Glanton v. Renner’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
5
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 2017

5 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

9019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on German v. German · Ostrander v. Ostrander · Cousineau v. Cousineau · Fjeld v. Fjeld · Honaker v. Honaker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]here is an abundance of authority to the effect that the domestic or local court rendering judgment upon a judgment of a foreign state has the power and authority ... to enforce the payment of such judgments ... as if the judgment had been originally rendered therein. [[Image here]] [T]he binding force of the judgment will be obligatory upon the courts of a sister state, provided the court rendering it had jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the parties, and it may proceed to enforce the judgment by the modes of procedure prevailing in that (local) jurisdiction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a judgment of a local court based upon the judgment of a sister state for alimony or support of children payable in installments, can go no further than to adjudge a recovery of the accrued payments, since such judgments, especially future installments, are subject to modification by the court of the jurisdiction rendering it and perhaps any court which may acquire jurisdiction of the matter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.