Vines v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Ball v. State (1997), Commonwealth v. Chacko (1983)
43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Brewer v. Williams · Oregon v. Mathiason
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“By custodial interrogation, we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“There seems to be general agreement ... that Miranda does not apply to `administrative questioning,' the routine questions asked of all arrestees who are `booked' or otherwise processed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When the officer gave Vines the copy of the warrant containing the inventory, he merely made the true statement that this was what was recovered from Vines’ house during the raid. We find it plain in the circumstances that the giving of the inventory to Vines in compliance with our rules of procedure, coupled with the simple factual statement by the police, was not tantamount to an “interrogation” within the meaning of Miranda. The display of some of the property taken does not compel a contrary result on the facts of this case.... In other words, there was no “interrogation” here to which the Miranda code was applicable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.