State v. Lindeman’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2020
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Finley · State v. Perry · Fiscus v. Beartooth Electric Cooperative, Inc. · Loney v. Milodragovich, Dale & Dye, P.C. · State v. Black
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he inquiry at any probation revocation hearing is whether the purposes of rehabilitation are being achieved, and whether, by virtue of subsequent criminal conduct or evidence that the defendant’s behavior was not in compliance with the rules and objectives of his probation, the purposes of probation are best served by continued liberty or by incarceration.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Aune · State v. Williams“(a) continue the suspended ... sentence without a change in conditions; (b) continue the suspended sentence with modified or additional terms and conditions; [or] (c) revoke the suspension of sentence and require the defendant to serve either the sentence imposed or any lesser sentence[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Richardson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.